Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Waukegan, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Waukegan, IL.
| Data | Safford | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 87,976 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 34.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $66,077 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Waukegan
- The population in Waukegan is higher at 87,976, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- The median age in Waukegan is higher at 34.5 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Waukegan has a higher median income of $66,077, compared to $64,860 in Safford.
- In Waukegan, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is higher in Waukegan at 14%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Waukegan has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Waukegan provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 18 |
| White | 31 | 2 |
| Asian | 1 | 7 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 54 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 18 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to 2% in Waukegan.
- In Waukegan, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 1% in Safford.
- Waukegan has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 54%, compared to 50% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waukegan at 18%, compared to 15% in Safford.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Safford and Waukegan at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.4% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 17.9% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.2% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Waukegan
- More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.6% in Waukegan.
- Depression is more prevalent in Safford at 19.9% compared to 17.9% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 15.2% in Waukegan.
- Waukegan has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Safford at 14.0% compared to 11.0% in Waukegan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Waukegan |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 3.1% (2,711) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 16.5% (14,503) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 27.1% (23,842) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 13.9% (12,220) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Waukegan
- In Waukegan, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.1% compared to 2.7% in Safford.
- In Waukegan, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.5% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waukegan at 27.1%, compared to 17.7% in Safford.
- In Waukegan, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.9% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.