Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Valdosta, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Valdosta, GA.
Data | Safford | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,297 | 55,074 |
Median Age | 31.6 years | 29.2 years |
Median Income | $64,860 | $41,365 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 25.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 19% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Valdosta
- The population in Valdosta is higher at 55,074, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- Residents in Safford have a higher median age of 31.6 years compared to 29.2 years in Valdosta.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $41,365 in Valdosta.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Safford at 33.0% compared to 25.0% in Valdosta.
- The poverty level is higher in Valdosta at 19%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Valdosta has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Valdosta provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Safford | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 56 |
White | 31 | 34 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 50 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 4 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 56% compared to 2% in Safford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Valdosta at 34% compared to 31% in Safford.
- Both Safford and Valdosta have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 5% in Valdosta.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 4% in Valdosta.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Valdosta.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Safford | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 15.4% |
Depression | 19.9% | 22.2% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 23.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 43.5% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Valdosta
- In Valdosta, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.7% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Valdosta at 22.2% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Valdosta has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Valdosta.
- Valdosta has higher obesity rates at 43.5% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Safford at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Valdosta.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Safford | Valdosta |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 1.0% (538) |
High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 16.3% (8,967) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 8.9% (4,906) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 15.9% (8,750) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Valdosta
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.0% in Valdosta.
- In Valdosta, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.3% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 8.9% in Valdosta.
- In Valdosta, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.9% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.