Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Palm bay, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Palm bay, FL.
| Data | Safford | Palm bay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 129,234 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 41.8 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $62,538 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Palm bay
- The population in Palm bay is higher at 129,234, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- The median age in Palm bay is higher at 41.8 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $62,538 in Palm bay.
- In Palm bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is higher in Palm bay at 10%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Palm bay has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Palm bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Palm bay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 18 |
| White | 31 | 51 |
| Asian | 1 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 17 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Palm bay
- In Palm bay, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 2% in Safford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Palm bay at 51% compared to 31% in Safford.
- In Palm bay, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Safford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 17% in Palm bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 12% in Palm bay.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Palm bay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Palm bay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 20.3% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.8% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Palm bay
- More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.8% in Palm bay.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Palm bay at 20.3% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Palm bay has a higher smoking rate at 19.6% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 15.8% in Palm bay.
- Obesity rates are higher in Safford at 35.2% compared to 34.9% in Palm bay.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Palm bay at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Palm bay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.9% (1,215) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 17.2% (22,173) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 11.5% (14,805) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 14.6% (18,880) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Palm bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.9% in Palm bay.
- In Palm bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.2% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 11.5% in Palm bay.
- In Palm bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.6% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.