Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Leitchfield, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Leitchfield, KY.
| Data | Safford | Leitchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 6,432 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 38.8 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $43,214 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 25.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Leitchfield
- In Safford, the population is higher at 10,297, compared to 6,432 in Leitchfield.
- The median age in Leitchfield is higher at 38.8 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $43,214 in Leitchfield.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Safford at 33.0% compared to 25.0% in Leitchfield.
- The poverty level is higher in Leitchfield at 14%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- The unemployment rate in Safford is higher at 3.5%, compared to 3.2% in Leitchfield.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Leitchfield provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Leitchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 2 |
| White | 31 | 95 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 50 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 3 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Leitchfield
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Safford and Leitchfield at 2%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Leitchfield at 95% compared to 31% in Safford.
- The Asian population is larger in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 3% in Leitchfield.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Leitchfield.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Leitchfield |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 21.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 16.7% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 30.0% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 27.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.1% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 41.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Leitchfield
- In Leitchfield, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 21.3% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Leitchfield at 30.0% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Leitchfield has a higher smoking rate at 27.5% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 14.1% in Leitchfield.
- Leitchfield has higher obesity rates at 41.5% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Leitchfield at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Leitchfield |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.3% (21) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 28.3% (1,821) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 23.4% (1,504) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 8.4% (540) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Leitchfield
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.3% in Leitchfield.
- In Leitchfield, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.3% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Leitchfield at 23.4%, compared to 17.7% in Safford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 8.4% in Leitchfield.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.