Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Laguna hills, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Laguna hills, CA.
Data | Safford | Laguna hills |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,297 | 30,568 |
Median Age | 31.6 years | 43.8 years |
Median Income | $64,860 | $122,902 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Laguna hills
- The population in Laguna hills is higher at 30,568, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- The median age in Laguna hills is higher at 43.8 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Laguna hills has a higher median income of $122,902, compared to $64,860 in Safford.
- In Laguna hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is higher in Laguna hills at 5%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Laguna hills has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Laguna hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Safford | Laguna hills |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 31 | 50 |
Asian | 1 | 17 |
Hispanic | 50 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 12 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Laguna hills
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Safford at 2% compared to 1% in Laguna hills.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Laguna hills at 50% compared to 31% in Safford.
- In Laguna hills, the Asian population stands at 17%, greater than 1% in Safford.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 20% in Laguna hills.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 12% in Laguna hills.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Laguna hills.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Safford | Laguna hills |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 13.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.6% |
Depression | 19.9% | 17.6% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 8.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 24.7% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Laguna hills
- More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 13.7% in Laguna hills.
- Depression is more prevalent in Safford at 19.9% compared to 17.6% in Laguna hills.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Safford at 16.6% compared to 8.5% in Laguna hills.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laguna hills at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Safford.
- Obesity rates are higher in Safford at 35.2% compared to 24.7% in Laguna hills.
- Disability percentages are higher in Safford at 14.0% compared to 10.0% in Laguna hills.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Safford | Laguna hills |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 1.1% (350) |
High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 8.9% (2,708) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 8.7% (2,666) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 39.8% (12,165) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Laguna hills
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.1% in Laguna hills.
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford hold a high school diploma at 11.1% compared to 8.9% in Laguna hills.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 8.7% in Laguna hills.
- In Laguna hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 39.8% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.