Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Hydro, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Hydro, OK.
Data | Safford | Hydro |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,297 | 898 |
Median Age | 31.6 years | 37.3 years |
Median Income | $64,860 | $37,361 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 34.0% |
Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Hydro
- In Safford, the population is higher at 10,297, compared to 898 in Hydro.
- The median age in Hydro is higher at 37.3 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $37,361 in Hydro.
- In Hydro, the percentage of married families is higher at 34.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Safford and Hydro at 0%.
- Hydro has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Hydro provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Safford | Hydro |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 1 |
White | 31 | 76 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 50 | 8 |
Two or More Races | 15 | 10 |
American Indian | 1 | 5 |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Safford at 2% compared to 1% in Hydro.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hydro at 76% compared to 31% in Safford.
- The Asian population is larger in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Hydro.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 8% in Hydro.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 10% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 1% in Safford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Safford | Hydro |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 18.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.9% |
Depression | 19.9% | 25.9% |
Smoking | 16.6% | 20.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 35.2% | 40.6% |
Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 34.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Hydro
- In Hydro, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.9% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hydro at 25.9% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Hydro has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 14.5% in Hydro.
- Hydro has higher obesity rates at 40.6% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hydro at 34.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Safford | Hydro |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 27.6% (248) |
Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 10.2% (92) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 19.6% (176) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Hydro
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.6% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 10.2% in Hydro.
- In Hydro, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.6% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.