Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Hiawassee, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Hiawassee, GA.
| Data | Safford | Hiawassee |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 1,017 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 56.5 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $40,917 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Hiawassee
- In Safford, the population is higher at 10,297, compared to 1,017 in Hiawassee.
- The median age in Hiawassee is higher at 56.5 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $40,917 in Hiawassee.
- In Hiawassee, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Safford and Hiawassee at 0%.
- The unemployment rate in Safford is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.9% in Hiawassee.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Hiawassee provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Hiawassee |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | Data is updating |
| White | 31 | 84 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 50 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 8 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Hiawassee
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Safford at 2% compared to 0% in Hiawassee.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hiawassee at 84% compared to 31% in Safford.
- The Asian population is larger in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Hiawassee.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 8% in Hiawassee.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 8% in Hiawassee.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Hiawassee.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Hiawassee |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 16.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 11.5% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 22.2% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 16.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.4% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Hiawassee
- More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 16.3% in Hiawassee.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hiawassee at 22.2% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Safford at 16.6% compared to 16.4% in Hiawassee.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 16.4% in Hiawassee.
- Obesity rates are higher in Safford at 35.2% compared to 32.4% in Hiawassee.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Hiawassee at 17.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Hiawassee |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 19.5% (198) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 29.3% (298) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 26.5% (270) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Hiawassee
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.0% in Hiawassee.
- In Hiawassee, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hiawassee at 29.3%, compared to 17.7% in Safford.
- In Hiawassee, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.5% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.