Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Fairfield bay, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Fairfield bay, AR.
| Data | Safford | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 2,152 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 68.2 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $58,750 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 48.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Fairfield bay
- In Safford, the population is higher at 10,297, compared to 2,152 in Fairfield bay.
- The median age in Fairfield bay is higher at 68.2 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $58,750 in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, the percentage of married families is higher at 48.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Safford and Fairfield bay at 0%.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Safford and Fairfield bay at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Fairfield bay provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 1 |
| White | 31 | 86 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 5 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Fairfield bay
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Safford at 2% compared to 1% in Fairfield bay.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Fairfield bay at 86% compared to 31% in Safford.
- Both Safford and Fairfield bay have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 7% in Fairfield bay.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 5% in Fairfield bay.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Fairfield bay.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.7% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 20.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 15.7% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 37.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Fairfield bay
- In Fairfield bay, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Fairfield bay at 27.1% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Fairfield bay has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 15.7% in Fairfield bay.
- Fairfield bay has higher obesity rates at 37.3% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Fairfield bay at 32.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Fairfield bay |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.2% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 24.6% (529) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 7.0% (151) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 33.9% (729) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Fairfield bay
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.2% in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.6% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 7.0% in Fairfield bay.
- In Fairfield bay, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 33.9% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.