Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Deridder, LA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Deridder, LA.
| Data | Safford | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 9,624 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 38.1 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $56,607 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Deridder
- In Safford, the population is higher at 10,297, compared to 9,624 in Deridder.
- The median age in Deridder is higher at 38.1 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $56,607 in Deridder.
- In Deridder, the percentage of married families is higher at 36.0%, compared to 33.0% in Safford.
- The poverty level is higher in Deridder at 18%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Deridder has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Deridder provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 32 |
| White | 31 | 49 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 11 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Deridder
- In Deridder, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 32% compared to 2% in Safford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Deridder at 49% compared to 31% in Safford.
- Both Safford and Deridder have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Safford at 50% compared to 7% in Deridder.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 11% in Deridder.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Safford at 1% compared to 0% in Deridder.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 13.1% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 27.1% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 21.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 42.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Deridder
- In Deridder, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 17.2% in Safford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Deridder at 27.1% versus 19.9% in Safford.
- Deridder has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 16.6% in Safford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Deridder at 17.6% compared to 17.0% in Safford.
- Deridder has higher obesity rates at 42.3% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Deridder at 21.0% compared to 14.0% in Safford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Deridder |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 0.7% (67) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 20.4% (1,963) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 13.7% (1,321) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 15.6% (1,505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Deridder
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Deridder.
- In Deridder, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 20.4% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- More residents in Safford have less than a high school education at 17.7% compared to 13.7% in Deridder.
- In Deridder, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.6% compared to 10.6% in Safford.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.