Demographics details for Safford, AZ vs Cicero, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Safford, AZ vs Cicero, IL.
| Data | Safford | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,297 | 81,919 |
| Median Age | 31.6 years | 33.4 years |
| Median Income | $64,860 | $64,325 |
| Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 6.4 |
Population Comparison: Safford vs Cicero
- The population in Cicero is higher at 81,919, compared to 10,297 in Safford.
- The median age in Cicero is higher at 33.4 years, compared to 31.6 years in Safford.
- Safford has a higher median income of $64,860 compared to $64,325 in Cicero.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Safford at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Cicero.
- The poverty level is higher in Cicero at 14%, compared to 0% in Safford.
- Cicero has a higher unemployment rate at 6.4% compared to 3.5% in Safford.
Demographics
Demographics Safford vs Cicero provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Safford | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 2 | 4 |
| White | 31 | -10 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 50 | 90 |
| Two or More Races | 15 | 14 |
| American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Safford vs Cicero
- In Cicero, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 2% in Safford.
- Safford has a higher percentage of White residents at 31% compared to -10% in Cicero.
- Both Safford and Cicero have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Cicero has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 90%, compared to 50% in Safford.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Safford at 15% compared to 14% in Cicero.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Safford and Cicero at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Safford | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.2% | 15.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 14.4% |
| Depression | 19.9% | 16.8% |
| Smoking | 16.6% | 16.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.0% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 35.2% | 36.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 14.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Safford vs Cicero
- More residents in Safford report poor mental health at 17.2% compared to 15.3% in Cicero.
- Depression is more prevalent in Safford at 19.9% compared to 16.8% in Cicero.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Safford at 16.6% compared to 16.5% in Cicero.
- Binge drinking is more common in Safford at 17.0% compared to 16.2% in Cicero.
- Cicero has higher obesity rates at 36.8% compared to 35.2% in Safford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Safford at 14.0% compared to 6.0% in Cicero.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Safford | Cicero |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.7% (274) | 3.2% (2,662) |
| High School Diploma | 11.1% (1,147) | 19.6% (16,037) |
| Less than High School | 17.7% (1,825) | 38.2% (31,314) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 10.6% (1,092) | 7.1% (5,829) |
Education Levels Comparison: Safford vs Cicero
- In Cicero, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.2% compared to 2.7% in Safford.
- In Cicero, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.6% compared to 11.1% in Safford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Cicero at 38.2%, compared to 17.7% in Safford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Safford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.6% compared to 7.1% in Cicero.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.