Demographics details for Sacred heart, MN vs Maple valley, WA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sacred heart, MN vs Maple valley, WA.

Data Sacred heart Maple valley
Population 498 28,220
Median Age 53.5 years 36.4 years
Median Income $59,107 $137,595
Married Families 41.0% 47.0%
Poverty Level 6% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.1 4.7

Population Comparison: Sacred heart vs Maple valley

  • The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
  • Residents in Sacred heart have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 36.4 years in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
  • In Maple valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 41.0% in Sacred heart.
  • Sacred heart has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
  • Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.1% in Sacred heart.

Demographics

Demographics Sacred heart vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sacred heart Maple valley
Black Data is updating 2
White 87 74
Asian Data is updating 11
Hispanic 13 5
Two or More Races Data is updating 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • Sacred heart has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sacred heart at 13% compared to 5% in Maple valley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sacred heart and Maple valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sacred heart Maple valley
Mental Health Not Good 15.0% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 9.6% 8.6%
Depression 23.3% 25.8%
Smoking 17.7% 9.4%
Binge Drinking 19.9% 19.6%
Obesity 37.6% 24.3%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.9% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 23.3% in Sacred heart.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Sacred heart at 17.7% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 19.6% in Maple valley.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Sacred heart at 37.6% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sacred heart Maple valley
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.4% (103)
High School Diploma 28.1% (140) 10.2% (2,878)
Less than High School 28.5% (142) 3.1% (879)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.3% (66) 28.5% (8,032)

Education Levels Comparison: Sacred heart vs Maple valley

  • In Maple valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sacred heart hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
  • More residents in Sacred heart have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
  • In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.