Demographics details for Sacred heart, MN vs Kelso, TN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sacred heart, MN vs Kelso, TN.
| Data | Sacred heart | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 498 | 185 |
| Median Age | 53.5 years | 42.0 years |
| Median Income | $59,107 | $60,000 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 70.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sacred heart vs Kelso
- In Sacred heart, the population is higher at 498, compared to 185 in Kelso.
- Residents in Sacred heart have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 42.0 years in Kelso.
- Kelso has a higher median income of $60,000, compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
- In Kelso, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 41.0% in Sacred heart.
- The poverty level is higher in Kelso at 13%, compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
- The unemployment rate in Sacred heart is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.5% in Kelso.
Demographics
Demographics Sacred heart vs Kelso provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sacred heart | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 100 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Kelso
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sacred heart and Kelso at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kelso at 100% compared to 87% in Sacred heart.
- Both Sacred heart and Kelso have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sacred heart at 13% compared to 0% in Kelso.
- Both Sacred heart and Kelso have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 0%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sacred heart and Kelso at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sacred heart | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | Data is updating% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | Data is updating% |
| Depression | 23.3% | Data is updating% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | Data is updating% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | Data is updating% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | Data is updating% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | Data is updating% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Kelso
- More residents in Sacred heart report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sacred heart at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sacred heart at 17.7% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sacred heart at 37.6% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sacred heart | Kelso |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (140) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (142) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (66) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sacred heart vs Kelso
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sacred heart and Kelso at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacred heart hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- More residents in Sacred heart have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacred heart hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.3% compared to 0.0% in Kelso.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.