Demographics details for Sacred heart, MN vs Frisco, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sacred heart, MN vs Frisco, TX.
| Data | Sacred heart | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 498 | 219,587 |
| Median Age | 53.5 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,107 | $144,567 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 3% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Sacred heart vs Frisco
- The population in Frisco is higher at 219,587, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
- Residents in Sacred heart have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 37.8 years in Frisco.
- Frisco has a higher median income of $144,567, compared to $59,107 in Sacred heart.
- In Frisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 41.0% in Sacred heart.
- Sacred heart has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 3% in Frisco.
- The unemployment rate in Sacred heart is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.9% in Frisco.
Demographics
Demographics Sacred heart vs Frisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sacred heart | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 8 |
| White | 87 | 49 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 23 |
| Hispanic | 13 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 8 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Frisco
- In Frisco, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- Sacred heart has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 49% in Frisco.
- In Frisco, the Asian population stands at 23%, greater than 0% in Sacred heart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sacred heart at 13% compared to 12% in Frisco.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Frisco at 8%, compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sacred heart and Frisco at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sacred heart | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 13.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 7.9% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 20.8% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 9.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 27.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Frisco
- More residents in Sacred heart report poor mental health at 15.0% compared to 13.4% in Frisco.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sacred heart at 23.3% compared to 20.8% in Frisco.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sacred heart at 17.7% compared to 9.6% in Frisco.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 18.4% in Frisco.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sacred heart at 37.6% compared to 27.4% in Frisco.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 6.0% in Frisco.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sacred heart | Frisco |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.6% (1,358) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (140) | 5.0% (11,084) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (142) | 3.4% (7,431) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (66) | 38.9% (85,346) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sacred heart vs Frisco
- In Frisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Sacred heart.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacred heart hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 5.0% in Frisco.
- More residents in Sacred heart have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 3.4% in Frisco.
- In Frisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.