Demographics details for Sacred heart, MN vs Fowler, KS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sacred heart, MN vs Fowler, KS.
| Data | Sacred heart | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 498 | 513 |
| Median Age | 53.5 years | 39.8 years |
| Median Income | $59,107 | $45,402 |
| Married Families | 41.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Sacred heart vs Fowler
- The population in Fowler is higher at 513, compared to 498 in Sacred heart.
- Residents in Sacred heart have a higher median age of 53.5 years compared to 39.8 years in Fowler.
- Sacred heart has a higher median income of $59,107 compared to $45,402 in Fowler.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sacred heart at 41.0% compared to 24.0% in Fowler.
- The poverty level is higher in Fowler at 13%, compared to 6% in Sacred heart.
- The unemployment rate in Sacred heart is higher at 4.1%, compared to 3.2% in Fowler.
Demographics
Demographics Sacred heart vs Fowler provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sacred heart | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 87 | 71 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 13 | 19 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 7 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 3 |
Demographics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Fowler
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sacred heart and Fowler at 0%.
- Sacred heart has a higher percentage of White residents at 87% compared to 71% in Fowler.
- Both Sacred heart and Fowler have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Fowler has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 19%, compared to 13% in Sacred heart.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fowler at 7%, compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
- In Fowler, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 3%, compared to 0% in Sacred heart.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sacred heart | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.6% | 11.3% |
| Depression | 23.3% | 21.2% |
| Smoking | 17.7% | 19.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 19.9% | 18.8% |
| Obesity | 37.6% | 39.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sacred heart vs Fowler
- In Fowler, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.5% compared to 15.0% in Sacred heart.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sacred heart at 23.3% compared to 21.2% in Fowler.
- Fowler has a higher smoking rate at 19.7% compared to 17.7% in Sacred heart.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sacred heart at 19.9% compared to 18.8% in Fowler.
- Fowler has higher obesity rates at 39.3% compared to 37.6% in Sacred heart.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sacred heart at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Fowler.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sacred heart | Fowler |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 28.1% (140) | 9.0% (46) |
| Less than High School | 28.5% (142) | 13.5% (69) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.3% (66) | 20.9% (107) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sacred heart vs Fowler
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sacred heart and Fowler at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacred heart hold a high school diploma at 28.1% compared to 9.0% in Fowler.
- More residents in Sacred heart have less than a high school education at 28.5% compared to 13.5% in Fowler.
- In Fowler, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.9% compared to 13.3% in Sacred heart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.