Demographics details for Sacramento, CA vs Sweetwater, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sacramento, CA vs Sweetwater, TX.
Data | Sacramento | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
Population | 528,001 | 10,408 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $78,954 | $44,306 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 32.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 5.4 |
Population Comparison: Sacramento vs Sweetwater
- In Sacramento, the population is higher at 528,001, compared to 10,408 in Sweetwater.
- The median age in Sweetwater is higher at 35.7 years, compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Sacramento has a higher median income of $78,954 compared to $44,306 in Sweetwater.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sacramento at 33.0% compared to 32.0% in Sweetwater.
- The poverty level is higher in Sweetwater at 15%, compared to 12% in Sacramento.
- Sweetwater has a higher unemployment rate at 5.4% compared to 5.0% in Sacramento.
Demographics
Demographics Sacramento vs Sweetwater provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sacramento | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 6 |
White | 26 | 34 |
Asian | 19 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 29 | 46 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 13 |
American Indian | 1 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sacramento vs Sweetwater
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sacramento at 12% compared to 6% in Sweetwater.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Sweetwater at 34% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- The Asian population is larger in Sacramento at 19% compared to 0% in Sweetwater.
- Sweetwater has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 46%, compared to 29% in Sacramento.
- Both Sacramento and Sweetwater have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 13%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sacramento and Sweetwater at 1%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sacramento | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 19.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 14.3% |
Depression | 18.3% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 20.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 17.3% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 38.9% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sacramento vs Sweetwater
- In Sweetwater, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.1% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Sweetwater at 24.2% versus 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Sweetwater has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Sweetwater at 17.3% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Sweetwater has higher obesity rates at 38.9% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Sweetwater at 21.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sacramento | Sweetwater |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (14,512) | 1.9% (194) |
High School Diploma | 11.7% (62,039) | 16.0% (1,666) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (77,760) | 23.1% (2,408) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (128,743) | 7.0% (733) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sacramento vs Sweetwater
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacramento have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 1.9% in Sweetwater.
- In Sweetwater, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 16.0% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Sweetwater at 23.1%, compared to 14.7% in Sacramento.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacramento hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 7.0% in Sweetwater.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.