Demographics details for Sacramento, CA vs Cross city, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sacramento, CA vs Cross city, FL.
Data | Sacramento | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Population | 528,001 | 1,754 |
Median Age | 35.2 years | 40.2 years |
Median Income | $78,954 | $44,500 |
Married Families | 33.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 18% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sacramento vs Cross city
- In Sacramento, the population is higher at 528,001, compared to 1,754 in Cross city.
- The median age in Cross city is higher at 40.2 years, compared to 35.2 years in Sacramento.
- Sacramento has a higher median income of $78,954 compared to $44,500 in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 33.0% in Sacramento.
- The poverty level is higher in Cross city at 18%, compared to 12% in Sacramento.
- The unemployment rate in Sacramento is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.5% in Cross city.
Demographics
Demographics Sacramento vs Cross city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sacramento | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Black | 12 | 20 |
White | 26 | 61 |
Asian | 19 | 2 |
Hispanic | 29 | 9 |
Two or More Races | 13 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sacramento vs Cross city
- In Cross city, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 12% in Sacramento.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cross city at 61% compared to 26% in Sacramento.
- The Asian population is larger in Sacramento at 19% compared to 2% in Cross city.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sacramento at 29% compared to 9% in Cross city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sacramento at 13% compared to 8% in Cross city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sacramento at 1% compared to 0% in Cross city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sacramento | Cross city |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.6% | 20.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.5% | 15.8% |
Depression | 18.3% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 13.7% | 29.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 14.8% |
Obesity | 32.7% | 40.8% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 32.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sacramento vs Cross city
- In Cross city, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 16.6% in Sacramento.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cross city at 23.8% versus 18.3% in Sacramento.
- Cross city has a higher smoking rate at 29.1% compared to 13.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cross city at 14.8% compared to 14.5% in Sacramento.
- Cross city has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 32.7% in Sacramento.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Cross city at 32.0% compared to 11.0% in Sacramento.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sacramento | Cross city |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.7% (14,512) | 0.9% (15) |
High School Diploma | 11.7% (62,039) | 39.2% (688) |
Less than High School | 14.7% (77,760) | 11.7% (205) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 24.4% (128,743) | 7.8% (136) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sacramento vs Cross city
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacramento have no formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.9% in Cross city.
- In Cross city, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 39.2% compared to 11.7% in Sacramento.
- More residents in Sacramento have less than a high school education at 14.7% compared to 11.7% in Cross city.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sacramento hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.4% compared to 7.8% in Cross city.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.