Environment details: Sabin MN
acceptable water quality with minor defects.
Environment details: Rich hill MO
water quality is poor, action needed quickly.
Compare Environment: Sabin MN vs Rich hill MO
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Sabin | Rich hill |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 665 | 936 |
| Water Quality | 6/10 | 3/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | acceptable water quality with minor defects. | water quality is poor, action needed quickly. |
| Median Air Quality | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.56 | 1.64 |
| Worst AQI | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 11 | 19 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Sabin vs Rich hill
- Water quality is rated higher in Sabin at 6/10 compared to 3/10 in Rich hill.
- Median air quality indexes are identical in both cities at 2.0.
- Air quality is better in Rich hill with an average index of 1.64 compared to 1.56 in Sabin.
- Rich hill experiences more days with poor air quality at 19 compared to 11 in Sabin.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.