Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Surprise, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Surprise, AZ.
| Data | Rutherford | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 154,198 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 41.5 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $87,756 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Surprise
- The population in Surprise is higher at 154,198, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- The median age in Surprise is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 40.5 years in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $87,756 in Surprise.
- In Surprise, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 42.0% in Rutherford.
- The poverty level is higher in Surprise at 13%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Surprise has a higher unemployment rate at 3.9% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Surprise provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 5 |
| White | 49 | 63 |
| Asian | 16 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 20 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Surprise
- In Surprise, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Surprise at 63% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 2% in Surprise.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 20% in Surprise.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 9% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Rutherford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 10.1% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 20.1% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 14.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 18.5% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 30.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Surprise
- In Surprise, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.0% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Surprise at 20.1% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Surprise has a higher smoking rate at 14.4% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Surprise has higher obesity rates at 30.1% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Surprise at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Surprise |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.5% (754) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 13.7% (21,050) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 7.6% (11,792) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 19.9% (30,735) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Surprise
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.7% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Surprise at 7.6%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 19.9% in Surprise.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.