Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Springville, UT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Springville, UT.
Data | Rutherford | Springville |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,662 | 35,832 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 26.9 years |
Median Income | $128,576 | $84,699 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 42.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Springville
- The population in Springville is higher at 35,832, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 26.9 years in Springville.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $84,699 in Springville.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Rutherford and Springville at 42.0%.
- Rutherford has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 5% in Springville.
- Springville has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Springville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rutherford | Springville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 49 | 78 |
Asian | 16 | 1 |
Hispanic | 21 | 16 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Springville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 0% in Springville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Springville at 78% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 1% in Springville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 16% in Springville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 5% in Springville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Springville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rutherford | Springville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 14.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 10.6% |
Depression | 17.0% | 23.8% |
Smoking | 10.8% | 7.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 8.2% |
Obesity | 24.9% | 30.9% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Springville
- In Springville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 14.9% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springville at 23.8% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rutherford at 10.8% compared to 7.5% in Springville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 8.2% in Springville.
- Springville has higher obesity rates at 30.9% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springville at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rutherford | Springville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.4% (141) |
High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 9.2% (3,312) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 5.2% (1,867) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 20.7% (7,419) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Springville
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.4% in Springville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a high school diploma at 12.4% compared to 9.2% in Springville.
- More residents in Rutherford have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 5.2% in Springville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 20.7% in Springville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.