Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Riceville, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Riceville, IA.
Data | Rutherford | Riceville |
---|---|---|
Population | 18,662 | 803 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 36.3 years |
Median Income | $128,576 | $48,009 |
Married Families | 42.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 8% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Riceville
- In Rutherford, the population is higher at 18,662, compared to 803 in Riceville.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 36.3 years in Riceville.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $48,009 in Riceville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 41.0% in Riceville.
- Rutherford has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 8% in Riceville.
- The unemployment rate in Rutherford is higher at 3.4%, compared to 2.5% in Riceville.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Riceville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rutherford | Riceville |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | Data is updating |
White | 49 | 87 |
Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 21 | 10 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Riceville
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 0% in Riceville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Riceville at 87% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 0% in Riceville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 10% in Riceville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 3% in Riceville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Riceville at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rutherford | Riceville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.8% |
Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 11.1% |
Depression | 17.0% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 10.8% | 20.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 21.2% |
Obesity | 24.9% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Riceville
- In Riceville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Riceville at 20.0% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Riceville has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Riceville at 21.2% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Riceville has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Riceville at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rutherford | Riceville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.1% (1) |
High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 27.9% (224) |
Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 9.5% (76) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 16.6% (133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Riceville
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.1% in Riceville.
- In Riceville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 27.9% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Riceville at 9.5%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.6% in Riceville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.