Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Mccurtain, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Mccurtain, OK.
| Data | Rutherford | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 30,931 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 38.2 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $47,046 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Mccurtain
- The population in Mccurtain is higher at 30,931, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 38.2 years in Mccurtain.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 37.0% in Mccurtain.
- The poverty level is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Mccurtain has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 49 | 58 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 14 |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Mccurtain at 58% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 1% in Mccurtain.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 7% in Mccurtain.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 11% in Rutherford.
- In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 0% in Rutherford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 20.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 25.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 46.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Mccurtain
- In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
- Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mccurtain at 21.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Mccurtain |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.7% (209) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 23.5% (7,268) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 17.2% (5,334) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 10.3% (3,200) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Mccurtain
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Mccurtain.
- In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 10.3% in Mccurtain.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.