Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Lanett, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Lanett, AL.
| Data | Rutherford | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 6,759 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 39.9 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $48,125 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 24.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Lanett
- In Rutherford, the population is higher at 18,662, compared to 6,759 in Lanett.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 39.9 years in Lanett.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $48,125 in Lanett.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 24.0% in Lanett.
- Rutherford has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The unemployment rate in Rutherford is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.2% in Lanett.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Lanett provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 73 |
| White | 49 | 16 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Lanett
- In Lanett, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 73% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 16% in Lanett.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 0% in Lanett.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 8% in Lanett.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 3% in Lanett.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Lanett at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 20.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 21.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.7% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 46.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.0% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Lanett at 22.1% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Lanett has a higher smoking rate at 21.6% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 12.7% in Lanett.
- Lanett has higher obesity rates at 46.5% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Lanett at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Lanett |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 1.3% (90) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 18.9% (1,277) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 20.3% (1,369) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 7.4% (498) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Lanett
- In Lanett, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.9% in Rutherford.
- In Lanett, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.9% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Lanett at 20.3%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 7.4% in Lanett.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.