Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Hollister, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Hollister, CA.
| Data | Rutherford | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 44,218 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 33.5 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $95,764 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 6.8 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Hollister
- The population in Hollister is higher at 44,218, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 33.5 years in Hollister.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $95,764 in Hollister.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 34.0% in Hollister.
- The poverty level is higher in Hollister at 12%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Hollister has a higher unemployment rate at 6.8% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Hollister provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 49 | -1 |
| Asian | 16 | 3 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 66 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 29 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Hollister
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 1% in Hollister.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to -1% in Hollister.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 3% in Hollister.
- Hollister has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 66%, compared to 21% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Hollister at 29%, compared to 11% in Rutherford.
- In Hollister, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Rutherford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 18.3% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.2% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 31.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.0% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hollister at 18.3% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Hollister has a higher smoking rate at 12.3% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 17.2% in Hollister.
- Hollister has higher obesity rates at 31.9% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Rutherford and Hollister at 9.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Hollister |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 2.2% (952) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 14.8% (6,534) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 22.3% (9,855) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 10.1% (4,484) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Hollister
- In Hollister, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.9% in Rutherford.
- In Hollister, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.8% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Hollister at 22.3%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 10.1% in Hollister.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.