Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Harris, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Harris, IA.
| Data | Rutherford | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 147 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 60.3 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $49,162 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 87.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.1 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Harris
- In Rutherford, the population is higher at 18,662, compared to 147 in Harris.
- The median age in Harris is higher at 60.3 years, compared to 40.5 years in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $49,162 in Harris.
- In Harris, the percentage of married families is higher at 87.0%, compared to 42.0% in Rutherford.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rutherford and Harris at 9%.
- The unemployment rate in Rutherford is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.1% in Harris.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Harris provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | Data is updating |
| White | 49 | 85 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Harris
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 0% in Harris.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harris at 85% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 0% in Harris.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 4% in Harris.
- Both Rutherford and Harris have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 11%.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Harris at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 19.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 21.9% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 40.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Harris
- In Harris, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Harris at 19.3% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Harris has a higher smoking rate at 19.3% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harris at 21.9% compared to 17.6% in Rutherford.
- Harris has higher obesity rates at 40.2% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harris at 11.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Harris |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 25.9% (38) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 117.0% (172) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 7.5% (11) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Harris
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.0% in Harris.
- In Harris, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.9% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Harris at 117.0%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 7.5% in Harris.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.