Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Brundidge, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Brundidge, AL.
| Data | Rutherford | Brundidge |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 2,034 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 49.9 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $37,627 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Brundidge
- In Rutherford, the population is higher at 18,662, compared to 2,034 in Brundidge.
- The median age in Brundidge is higher at 49.9 years, compared to 40.5 years in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $37,627 in Brundidge.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 39.0% in Brundidge.
- The poverty level is higher in Brundidge at 20%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Brundidge has a higher unemployment rate at 4.0% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Brundidge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Brundidge |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 67 |
| White | 49 | 12 |
| Asian | 16 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 21 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 5 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 67% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- Rutherford has a higher percentage of White residents at 49% compared to 12% in Brundidge.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 0% in Brundidge.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 16% in Brundidge.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 5% in Brundidge.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Brundidge at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Brundidge |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 20.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 15.2% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 12.2% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 45.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 25.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Brundidge
- In Brundidge, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Brundidge at 20.7% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Brundidge has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 12.2% in Brundidge.
- Brundidge has higher obesity rates at 45.7% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Brundidge at 25.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Brundidge |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.5% (11) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 35.9% (731) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 22.7% (461) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 11.8% (240) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Brundidge
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.5% in Brundidge.
- In Brundidge, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.9% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Brundidge at 22.7%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 11.8% in Brundidge.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.