Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Auburn, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Auburn, AL.
| Data | Rutherford | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 80,006 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 25.9 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $55,509 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Auburn
- The population in Auburn is higher at 80,006, compared to 18,662 in Rutherford.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 25.9 years in Auburn.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $55,509 in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 32.0% in Auburn.
- The poverty level is higher in Auburn at 10%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- The unemployment rate in Rutherford is higher at 3.4%, compared to 3.0% in Auburn.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Auburn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 17 |
| White | 49 | 69 |
| Asian | 16 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 3 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Auburn
- In Auburn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 3% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Auburn at 69% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 8% in Auburn.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rutherford at 21% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rutherford at 11% compared to 3% in Auburn.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rutherford and Auburn at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 12.0% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 22.0% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 15.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.5% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 38.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Auburn
- In Auburn, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Auburn at 22.0% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Auburn has a higher smoking rate at 15.5% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 14.5% in Auburn.
- Auburn has higher obesity rates at 38.7% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rutherford at 9.0% compared to 8.0% in Auburn.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Auburn |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 0.3% (236) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 5.3% (4,206) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 2.5% (1,964) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 30.7% (24,546) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Auburn
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford have no formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.3% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a high school diploma at 12.4% compared to 5.3% in Auburn.
- More residents in Rutherford have less than a high school education at 6.3% compared to 2.5% in Auburn.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 30.7% in Auburn.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.