Demographics details for Rutherford, NJ vs Aberdeen, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rutherford, NJ vs Aberdeen, WA.
| Data | Rutherford | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 18,662 | 17,113 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 37.1 years |
| Median Income | $128,576 | $50,008 |
| Married Families | 42.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.4 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Rutherford vs Aberdeen
- In Rutherford, the population is higher at 18,662, compared to 17,113 in Aberdeen.
- Residents in Rutherford have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 37.1 years in Aberdeen.
- Rutherford has a higher median income of $128,576 compared to $50,008 in Aberdeen.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rutherford at 42.0% compared to 29.0% in Aberdeen.
- The poverty level is higher in Aberdeen at 18%, compared to 9% in Rutherford.
- Aberdeen has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.4% in Rutherford.
Demographics
Demographics Rutherford vs Aberdeen provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rutherford | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 1 |
| White | 49 | 63 |
| Asian | 16 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 21 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Rutherford vs Aberdeen
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rutherford at 3% compared to 1% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Aberdeen at 63% compared to 49% in Rutherford.
- The Asian population is larger in Rutherford at 16% compared to 1% in Aberdeen.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Rutherford and Aberdeen at 21%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Aberdeen at 12%, compared to 11% in Rutherford.
- In Aberdeen, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Rutherford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rutherford | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 20.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 7.8% | 14.2% |
| Depression | 17.0% | 29.4% |
| Smoking | 10.8% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 16.0% |
| Obesity | 24.9% | 35.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 9.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rutherford vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 13.2% in Rutherford.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Aberdeen at 29.4% versus 17.0% in Rutherford.
- Aberdeen has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 10.8% in Rutherford.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rutherford at 17.6% compared to 16.0% in Aberdeen.
- Aberdeen has higher obesity rates at 35.6% compared to 24.9% in Rutherford.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Aberdeen at 22.0% compared to 9.0% in Rutherford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rutherford | Aberdeen |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.9% (161) | 1.5% (261) |
| High School Diploma | 12.4% (2,318) | 15.7% (2,683) |
| Less than High School | 6.3% (1,175) | 19.2% (3,285) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (7,259) | 10.8% (1,840) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rutherford vs Aberdeen
- In Aberdeen, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.9% in Rutherford.
- In Aberdeen, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 15.7% compared to 12.4% in Rutherford.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Aberdeen at 19.2%, compared to 6.3% in Rutherford.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rutherford hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 10.8% in Aberdeen.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.