Demographics details for Ruston, LA vs Farmington hills, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Ruston, LA vs Farmington hills, MI.

Data Ruston Farmington hills
Population 22,295 82,737
Median Age 23.6 years 41.6 years
Median Income $32,877 $101,728
Married Families 21.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 22% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 2.8

Population Comparison: Ruston vs Farmington hills

  • The population in Farmington hills is higher at 82,737, compared to 22,295 in Ruston.
  • The median age in Farmington hills is higher at 41.6 years, compared to 23.6 years in Ruston.
  • Farmington hills has a higher median income of $101,728, compared to $32,877 in Ruston.
  • In Farmington hills, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 21.0% in Ruston.
  • Ruston has a higher poverty level at 22% compared to 5% in Farmington hills.
  • The unemployment rate in Ruston is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.8% in Farmington hills.

Demographics

Demographics Ruston vs Farmington hills provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Ruston Farmington hills
Black 42 18
White 47 59
Asian 3 15
Hispanic 3 2
Two or More Races 4 6
American Indian 1 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Ruston vs Farmington hills

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Ruston at 42% compared to 18% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmington hills at 59% compared to 47% in Ruston.
  • In Farmington hills, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 3% in Ruston.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Ruston at 3% compared to 2% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Farmington hills at 6%, compared to 4% in Ruston.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Ruston at 1% compared to 0% in Farmington hills.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Ruston Farmington hills
Mental Health Not Good 20.5% 13.6%
Physical Health Not Good 15.0% 8.0%
Depression 26.0% 19.0%
Smoking 23.5% 11.4%
Binge Drinking 15.4% 17.5%
Obesity 45.3% 29.1%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Ruston vs Farmington hills

  • More residents in Ruston report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 13.6% in Farmington hills.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Ruston at 26.0% compared to 19.0% in Farmington hills.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Ruston at 23.5% compared to 11.4% in Farmington hills.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmington hills at 17.5% compared to 15.4% in Ruston.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Ruston at 45.3% compared to 29.1% in Farmington hills.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Farmington hills at 11.0% compared to 10.0% in Ruston.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Ruston Farmington hills
No Schooling 0.3% (65) 0.6% (488)
High School Diploma 10.7% (2,380) 9.5% (7,900)
Less than High School 4.2% (944) 6.0% (4,947)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 19.3% (4,294) 42.2% (34,948)

Education Levels Comparison: Ruston vs Farmington hills

  • In Farmington hills, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Ruston.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Ruston hold a high school diploma at 10.7% compared to 9.5% in Farmington hills.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmington hills at 6.0%, compared to 4.2% in Ruston.
  • In Farmington hills, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.2% compared to 19.3% in Ruston.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.