Demographics details for Russellville, KY vs Woods hole, MA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russellville, KY vs Woods hole, MA.

Data Russellville Woods hole
Population 7,282 992
Median Age 35.9 years 65.8 years
Median Income $45,484 $72,031
Married Families 38.0% 36.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.0 3.5

Population Comparison: Russellville vs Woods hole

  • In Russellville, the population is higher at 7,282, compared to 992 in Woods hole.
  • The median age in Woods hole is higher at 65.8 years, compared to 35.9 years in Russellville.
  • Woods hole has a higher median income of $72,031, compared to $45,484 in Russellville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Russellville at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Woods hole.
  • Russellville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Woods hole.
  • The unemployment rate in Russellville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.5% in Woods hole.

Demographics

Demographics Russellville vs Woods hole provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russellville Woods hole
Black 14 Data is updating
White 79 96
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 4 Data is updating
Two or More Races 2 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russellville vs Woods hole

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Russellville at 14% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Woods hole at 96% compared to 79% in Russellville.
  • The Asian population is larger in Russellville at 1% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Russellville at 4% compared to 0% in Woods hole.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Woods hole at 4%, compared to 2% in Russellville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russellville and Woods hole at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russellville Woods hole
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 13.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.3% 7.3%
Depression 28.3% 21.5%
Smoking 24.1% 9.5%
Binge Drinking 14.2% 19.3%
Obesity 43.0% 26.0%
Disability Percentage 21.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russellville vs Woods hole

  • More residents in Russellville report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 13.8% in Woods hole.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russellville at 28.3% compared to 21.5% in Woods hole.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russellville at 24.1% compared to 9.5% in Woods hole.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Woods hole at 19.3% compared to 14.2% in Russellville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russellville at 43.0% compared to 26.0% in Woods hole.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russellville at 21.0% compared to 12.0% in Woods hole.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russellville Woods hole
No Schooling 1.1% (83) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 24.4% (1,780) 7.4% (73)
Less than High School 12.4% (903) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.1% (665) 67.2% (667)

Education Levels Comparison: Russellville vs Woods hole

  • A higher percentage of residents in Russellville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russellville hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 7.4% in Woods hole.
  • More residents in Russellville have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 0.0% in Woods hole.
  • In Woods hole, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 67.2% compared to 9.1% in Russellville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.