Demographics details for Russellville, KY vs Darwin, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Russellville, KY vs Darwin, MN.
| Data | Russellville | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,282 | 344 |
| Median Age | 35.9 years | 34.8 years |
| Median Income | $45,484 | $62,083 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 5% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.0 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Russellville vs Darwin
- In Russellville, the population is higher at 7,282, compared to 344 in Darwin.
- Residents in Russellville have a higher median age of 35.9 years compared to 34.8 years in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher median income of $62,083, compared to $45,484 in Russellville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Russellville at 38.0% compared to 37.0% in Darwin.
- Russellville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Darwin.
- The unemployment rate in Russellville is higher at 4.0%, compared to 3.2% in Darwin.
Demographics
Demographics Russellville vs Darwin provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Russellville | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 14 | Data is updating |
| White | 79 | 90 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 4 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 2 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Russellville vs Darwin
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Russellville at 14% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Darwin at 90% compared to 79% in Russellville.
- The Asian population is larger in Russellville at 1% compared to 0% in Darwin.
- Darwin has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 4% in Russellville.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Russellville at 2% compared to 1% in Darwin.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russellville and Darwin at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Russellville | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 14.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.3% | 8.8% |
| Depression | 28.3% | 23.2% |
| Smoking | 24.1% | 17.5% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.2% | 22.3% |
| Obesity | 43.0% | 32.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 21.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Russellville vs Darwin
- More residents in Russellville report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 14.7% in Darwin.
- Depression is more prevalent in Russellville at 28.3% compared to 23.2% in Darwin.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Russellville at 24.1% compared to 17.5% in Darwin.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Darwin at 22.3% compared to 14.2% in Russellville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Russellville at 43.0% compared to 32.7% in Darwin.
- Disability percentages are higher in Russellville at 21.0% compared to 19.0% in Darwin.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Russellville | Darwin |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (83) | 1.7% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 24.4% (1,780) | 20.9% (72) |
| Less than High School | 12.4% (903) | 9.3% (32) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.1% (665) | 11.9% (41) |
Education Levels Comparison: Russellville vs Darwin
- In Darwin, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 1.1% in Russellville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Russellville hold a high school diploma at 24.4% compared to 20.9% in Darwin.
- More residents in Russellville have less than a high school education at 12.4% compared to 9.3% in Darwin.
- In Darwin, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.9% compared to 9.1% in Russellville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.