Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Yuma, AZ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Yuma, AZ.

Data Russell springs Yuma
Population 2,750 98,527
Median Age 44.8 years 32.0 years
Median Income $34,219 $59,312
Married Families 29.0% 39.0%
Poverty Level 15% 18%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 9.0

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Yuma

  • The population in Yuma is higher at 98,527, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 32.0 years in Yuma.
  • Yuma has a higher median income of $59,312, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Yuma, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in Yuma at 18%, compared to 15% in Russell springs.
  • Yuma has a higher unemployment rate at 9.0% compared to 4.5% in Russell springs.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Yuma provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Yuma
Black 1 2
White 88 13
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 3 61
Two or More Races 8 21
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Yuma

  • In Yuma, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 13% in Yuma.
  • In Yuma, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • Yuma has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 61%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Yuma at 21%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • In Yuma, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Yuma
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 13.2%
Depression 29.0% 19.3%
Smoking 25.6% 16.2%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 17.6%
Obesity 40.3% 39.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 12.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Yuma

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 16.8% in Yuma.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 19.3% in Yuma.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 16.2% in Yuma.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Yuma at 17.6% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 39.5% in Yuma.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 12.0% in Yuma.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Yuma
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 1.7% (1,642)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 13.2% (13,054)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 19.8% (19,520)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 12.3% (12,116)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Yuma

  • In Yuma, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 13.2% in Yuma.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 19.8% in Yuma.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 12.3% in Yuma.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.