Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Westminster, CO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Westminster, CO.
Data | Russell springs | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Population | 2,750 | 114,533 |
Median Age | 44.8 years | 37.4 years |
Median Income | $34,219 | $90,651 |
Married Families | 29.0% | 41.0% |
Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.1 |
Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Westminster
- The population in Westminster is higher at 114,533, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
- Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 37.4 years in Westminster.
- Westminster has a higher median income of $90,651, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
- In Westminster, the percentage of married families is higher at 41.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
- Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Westminster.
- The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Westminster.
Demographics
Demographics Russell springs vs Westminster provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Russell springs | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Black | 1 | 1 |
White | 88 | 58 |
Asian | Data is updating | 5 |
Hispanic | 3 | 24 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Westminster
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Russell springs and Westminster at 1%.
- Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 58% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
- Westminster has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 24%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Westminster at 11%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
- In Westminster, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Russell springs | Westminster |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 14.2% |
Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 9.6% |
Depression | 29.0% | 21.1% |
Smoking | 25.6% | 13.5% |
Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 21.5% |
Obesity | 40.3% | 26.9% |
Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Westminster
- More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 14.2% in Westminster.
- Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 21.1% in Westminster.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 13.5% in Westminster.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Westminster at 21.5% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 26.9% in Westminster.
- Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Westminster.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Russell springs | Westminster |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 0.9% (1,007) |
High School Diploma | 13.6% (375) | 11.9% (13,626) |
Less than High School | 23.3% (642) | 10.3% (11,853) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (505) | 30.3% (34,676) |
Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Westminster
- In Westminster, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.9% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 11.9% in Westminster.
- More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 10.3% in Westminster.
- In Westminster, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.3% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.