Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Shafter, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Shafter, CA.
| Data | Russell springs | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,750 | 21,282 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 27.4 years |
| Median Income | $34,219 | $66,418 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 20% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Shafter
- The population in Shafter is higher at 21,282, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
- Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 27.4 years in Shafter.
- Shafter has a higher median income of $66,418, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
- In Shafter, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Shafter at 20%, compared to 15% in Russell springs.
- Shafter has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Russell springs.
Demographics
Demographics Russell springs vs Shafter provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Russell springs | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 2 |
| White | 88 | -9 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 78 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 27 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Shafter
- In Shafter, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
- Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -9% in Shafter.
- In Shafter, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
- Shafter has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 78%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Shafter at 27%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
- In Shafter, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Russell springs | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 18.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 16.6% |
| Depression | 29.0% | 19.7% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 18.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 39.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 6.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Shafter
- More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.8% in Shafter.
- Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 19.7% in Shafter.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 18.3% in Shafter.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Shafter at 14.9% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 39.4% in Shafter.
- Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 6.0% in Shafter.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Russell springs | Shafter |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 2.7% (567) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (375) | 14.1% (2,992) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (642) | 32.9% (6,999) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (505) | 5.7% (1,217) |
Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Shafter
- In Shafter, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
- In Shafter, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.1% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Shafter at 32.9%, compared to 23.3% in Russell springs.
- A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 5.7% in Shafter.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.