Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Port lavaca, TX

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Port lavaca, TX.

Data Russell springs Port lavaca
Population 2,750 11,262
Median Age 44.8 years 34.8 years
Median Income $34,219 $58,871
Married Families 29.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 15% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Port lavaca

  • The population in Port lavaca is higher at 11,262, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 34.8 years in Port lavaca.
  • Port lavaca has a higher median income of $58,871, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Port lavaca, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Russell springs and Port lavaca at 15%.
  • The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in Port lavaca.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Port lavaca provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Port lavaca
Black 1 5
White 88 6
Asian Data is updating 7
Hispanic 3 64
Two or More Races 8 18
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Port lavaca

  • In Port lavaca, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 6% in Port lavaca.
  • In Port lavaca, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • Port lavaca has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 64%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port lavaca at 18%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and Port lavaca at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Port lavaca
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 17.3%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 13.3%
Depression 29.0% 21.5%
Smoking 25.6% 17.5%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 16.9%
Obesity 40.3% 38.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 18.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Port lavaca

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 17.3% in Port lavaca.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 21.5% in Port lavaca.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 17.5% in Port lavaca.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Port lavaca at 16.9% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 38.4% in Port lavaca.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port lavaca at 18.0% compared to 15.0% in Russell springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Port lavaca
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 2.0% (230)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 21.3% (2,404)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 24.2% (2,728)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 9.7% (1,091)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Port lavaca

  • In Port lavaca, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.0% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • In Port lavaca, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port lavaca at 24.2%, compared to 23.3% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 9.7% in Port lavaca.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.