Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Perth amboy, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Perth amboy, NJ.

Data Russell springs Perth amboy
Population 2,750 55,357
Median Age 44.8 years 36.0 years
Median Income $34,219 $56,239
Married Families 29.0% 28.0%
Poverty Level 15% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 7.2

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Perth amboy

  • The population in Perth amboy is higher at 55,357, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 36.0 years in Perth amboy.
  • Perth amboy has a higher median income of $56,239, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 28.0% in Perth amboy.
  • The poverty level is higher in Perth amboy at 20%, compared to 15% in Russell springs.
  • Perth amboy has a higher unemployment rate at 7.2% compared to 4.5% in Russell springs.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Perth amboy provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Perth amboy
Black 1 8
White 88 -3
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 79
Two or More Races 8 13
American Indian Data is updating 2

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Perth amboy

  • In Perth amboy, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to -3% in Perth amboy.
  • In Perth amboy, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • Perth amboy has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 79%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Perth amboy at 13%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • In Perth amboy, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Perth amboy
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 16.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 14.0%
Depression 29.0% 19.3%
Smoking 25.6% 15.7%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 13.2%
Obesity 40.3% 38.8%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 14.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Perth amboy

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 16.8% in Perth amboy.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 19.3% in Perth amboy.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 15.7% in Perth amboy.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Russell springs at 14.5% compared to 13.2% in Perth amboy.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 38.8% in Perth amboy.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 14.0% in Perth amboy.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Perth amboy
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 3.7% (2,062)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 19.4% (10,752)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 38.5% (21,328)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 9.6% (5,312)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Perth amboy

  • In Perth amboy, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.7% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • In Perth amboy, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.4% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Perth amboy at 38.5%, compared to 23.3% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 9.6% in Perth amboy.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.