Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Penn valley, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Penn valley, CA.

Data Russell springs Penn valley
Population 2,750 1,188
Median Age 44.8 years 55.7 years
Median Income $34,219 $65,882
Married Families 29.0% 60.0%
Poverty Level 15% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.1

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Penn valley

  • In Russell springs, the population is higher at 2,750, compared to 1,188 in Penn valley.
  • The median age in Penn valley is higher at 55.7 years, compared to 44.8 years in Russell springs.
  • Penn valley has a higher median income of $65,882, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Penn valley, the percentage of married families is higher at 60.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 8% in Penn valley.
  • Penn valley has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Russell springs.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Penn valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Penn valley
Black 1 Data is updating
White 88 86
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 7
Two or More Races 8 7
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Penn valley

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Russell springs at 1% compared to 0% in Penn valley.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 86% in Penn valley.
  • Both Russell springs and Penn valley have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Penn valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 7% in Penn valley.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and Penn valley at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Penn valley
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 18.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 11.8%
Depression 29.0% 22.9%
Smoking 25.6% 14.8%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 17.9%
Obesity 40.3% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Penn valley

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.4% in Penn valley.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 22.9% in Penn valley.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 14.8% in Penn valley.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Penn valley at 17.9% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 29.5% in Penn valley.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Penn valley at 30.0% compared to 15.0% in Russell springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Penn valley
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 4.9% (58)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 21.6% (257)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 8.2% (98)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 12.3% (146)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Penn valley

  • In Penn valley, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 4.9% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • In Penn valley, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.6% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 8.2% in Penn valley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 12.3% in Penn valley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.