Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs New roads, LA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs New roads, LA.

Data Russell springs New roads
Population 2,750 4,383
Median Age 44.8 years 46.5 years
Median Income $34,219 $47,792
Married Families 29.0% 32.0%
Poverty Level 15% 20%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 5.0

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs New roads

  • The population in New roads is higher at 4,383, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • The median age in New roads is higher at 46.5 years, compared to 44.8 years in Russell springs.
  • New roads has a higher median income of $47,792, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In New roads, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • The poverty level is higher in New roads at 20%, compared to 15% in Russell springs.
  • New roads has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Russell springs.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs New roads provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs New roads
Black 1 53
White 88 42
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 4
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs New roads

  • In New roads, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 53% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 42% in New roads.
  • In New roads, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Russell springs at 3% compared to 0% in New roads.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 4% in New roads.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and New roads at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs New roads
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 19.9%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 14.1%
Depression 29.0% 25.9%
Smoking 25.6% 22.8%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 16.2%
Obesity 40.3% 42.7%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 31.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs New roads

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.9% in New roads.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 25.9% in New roads.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 22.8% in New roads.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in New roads at 16.2% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • New roads has higher obesity rates at 42.7% compared to 40.3% in Russell springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in New roads at 31.0% compared to 15.0% in Russell springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs New roads
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 0.5% (23)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 28.7% (1,260)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 16.0% (701)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 12.8% (559)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs New roads

  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in New roads.
  • In New roads, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.7% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 16.0% in New roads.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 12.8% in New roads.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.