Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Healdton, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Healdton, OK.

Data Russell springs Healdton
Population 2,750 2,334
Median Age 44.8 years 42.9 years
Median Income $34,219 $45,721
Married Families 29.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 15% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Healdton

  • In Russell springs, the population is higher at 2,750, compared to 2,334 in Healdton.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 42.9 years in Healdton.
  • Healdton has a higher median income of $45,721, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Healdton, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 0% in Healdton.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Russell springs and Healdton at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Healdton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Healdton
Black 1 1
White 88 75
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 8
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 5

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Healdton

  • The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Russell springs and Healdton at 1%.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 75% in Healdton.
  • Both Russell springs and Healdton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Healdton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Healdton at 11%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
  • In Healdton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 5%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Healdton
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 20.8%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 14.9%
Depression 29.0% 28.2%
Smoking 25.6% 24.9%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 14.6%
Obesity 40.3% 42.2%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 26.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Healdton

  • In Healdton, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.8% compared to 20.7% in Russell springs.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 28.2% in Healdton.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 24.9% in Healdton.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Healdton at 14.6% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Healdton has higher obesity rates at 42.2% compared to 40.3% in Russell springs.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Healdton at 26.0% compared to 15.0% in Russell springs.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Healdton
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 3.4% (80)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 24.2% (565)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 25.1% (587)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 11.8% (276)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Healdton

  • In Healdton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 3.4% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • In Healdton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.2% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Healdton at 25.1%, compared to 23.3% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 11.8% in Healdton.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.