Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Harlowton, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Harlowton, MT.
| Data | Russell springs | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,750 | 933 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 50.7 years |
| Median Income | $34,219 | $55,536 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.0 |
Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Harlowton
- In Russell springs, the population is higher at 2,750, compared to 933 in Harlowton.
- The median age in Harlowton is higher at 50.7 years, compared to 44.8 years in Russell springs.
- Harlowton has a higher median income of $55,536, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
- In Harlowton, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
- The poverty level is identical in both Russell springs and Harlowton at 15%.
- The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.0% in Harlowton.
Demographics
Demographics Russell springs vs Harlowton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Russell springs | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | Data is updating |
| White | 88 | 90 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Harlowton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Russell springs at 1% compared to 0% in Harlowton.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Harlowton at 90% compared to 88% in Russell springs.
- Both Russell springs and Harlowton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Harlowton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 1% in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Russell springs.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Russell springs | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 12.9% |
| Depression | 29.0% | 25.7% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 21.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 21.7% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 36.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Harlowton
- More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 18.1% in Harlowton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 25.7% in Harlowton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 21.4% in Harlowton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Harlowton at 21.7% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 36.0% in Harlowton.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Harlowton at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Russell springs.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Russell springs | Harlowton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 0.5% (5) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (375) | 30.1% (281) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (642) | 17.0% (159) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (505) | 10.6% (99) |
Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Harlowton
- A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Harlowton.
- In Harlowton, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 30.1% compared to 13.6% in Russell springs.
- More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 17.0% in Harlowton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 10.6% in Harlowton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.