Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Gretna, NE

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Gretna, NE.

Data Russell springs Gretna
Population 2,750 9,071
Median Age 44.8 years 35.7 years
Median Income $34,219 $117,553
Married Families 29.0% 43.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 3.2

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Gretna

  • The population in Gretna is higher at 9,071, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 35.7 years in Gretna.
  • Gretna has a higher median income of $117,553, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Gretna, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Gretna.
  • The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.2% in Gretna.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Gretna provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Gretna
Black 1 Data is updating
White 88 93
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 3 4
Two or More Races 8 3
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Gretna

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Russell springs at 1% compared to 0% in Gretna.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Gretna at 93% compared to 88% in Russell springs.
  • Both Russell springs and Gretna have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • Gretna has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 3% in Gretna.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and Gretna at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Gretna
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 12.0%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 7.0%
Depression 29.0% 17.5%
Smoking 25.6% 11.0%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 21.8%
Obesity 40.3% 35.0%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 7.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Gretna

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 12.0% in Gretna.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 17.5% in Gretna.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 11.0% in Gretna.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Gretna at 21.8% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 35.0% in Gretna.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Gretna.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Gretna
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 0.1% (9)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 10.9% (988)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 2.8% (252)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 31.3% (2,839)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Gretna

  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Gretna.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 10.9% in Gretna.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 2.8% in Gretna.
  • In Gretna, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 31.3% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.