Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Dearborn, MI

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Dearborn, MI.

Data Russell springs Dearborn
Population 2,750 107,710
Median Age 44.8 years 32.3 years
Median Income $34,219 $64,600
Married Families 29.0% 38.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.1

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Dearborn

  • The population in Dearborn is higher at 107,710, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 32.3 years in Dearborn.
  • Dearborn has a higher median income of $64,600, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Dearborn, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Dearborn.
  • The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.1% in Dearborn.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Dearborn provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Dearborn
Black 1 3
White 88 86
Asian Data is updating 3
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 8 5
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Dearborn

  • In Dearborn, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 86% in Dearborn.
  • In Dearborn, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Russell springs and Dearborn at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 5% in Dearborn.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and Dearborn at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Dearborn
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 19.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 13.7%
Depression 29.0% 26.6%
Smoking 25.6% 24.6%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 17.6%
Obesity 40.3% 34.2%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 11.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Dearborn

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 19.4% in Dearborn.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 26.6% in Dearborn.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 24.6% in Dearborn.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Dearborn at 17.6% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 34.2% in Dearborn.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Dearborn.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Dearborn
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 2.8% (3,058)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 12.3% (13,249)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 17.5% (18,849)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 21.3% (22,938)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Dearborn

  • In Dearborn, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.8% compared to 0.7% in Russell springs.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 12.3% in Dearborn.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 17.5% in Dearborn.
  • In Dearborn, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.