Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Culleoka, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Culleoka, TN.

Data Russell springs Culleoka
Population 2,750 340
Median Age 44.8 years 36.0 years
Median Income $34,219 $50,000
Married Families 29.0% 70.0%
Poverty Level 15% 12%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Culleoka

  • In Russell springs, the population is higher at 2,750, compared to 340 in Culleoka.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 36.0 years in Culleoka.
  • Culleoka has a higher median income of $50,000, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In Culleoka, the percentage of married families is higher at 70.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 12% in Culleoka.
  • The unemployment rate is the same in both Russell springs and Culleoka at 4.5%.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs Culleoka provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs Culleoka
Black 1 4
White 88 90
Asian Data is updating 2
Hispanic 3 3
Two or More Races 8 1
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Culleoka

  • In Culleoka, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 4% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Culleoka at 90% compared to 88% in Russell springs.
  • In Culleoka, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Russell springs and Culleoka at 3%.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 1% in Culleoka.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and Culleoka at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs Culleoka
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% Data is updating%
Depression 29.0% Data is updating%
Smoking 25.6% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 14.5% Data is updating%
Obesity 40.3% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 15.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Culleoka

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Russell springs at 14.5% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs Culleoka
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Culleoka

  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 0.0% in Culleoka.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.