Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs Beaverton, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs Beaverton, OR.
| Data | Russell springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,750 | 97,053 |
| Median Age | 44.8 years | 36.7 years |
| Median Income | $34,219 | $88,899 |
| Married Families | 29.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Russell springs vs Beaverton
- The population in Beaverton is higher at 97,053, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
- Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 36.7 years in Beaverton.
- Beaverton has a higher median income of $88,899, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
- In Beaverton, the percentage of married families is higher at 38.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
- Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 7% in Beaverton.
- The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.6% in Beaverton.
Demographics
Demographics Russell springs vs Beaverton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Russell springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 3 |
| White | 88 | 57 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 12 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 10 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs Beaverton
- In Beaverton, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 3% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
- Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 57% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, the Asian population stands at 12%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
- Beaverton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Beaverton at 10%, compared to 8% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and Beaverton at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Russell springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.7% | 15.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 9.3% |
| Depression | 29.0% | 22.9% |
| Smoking | 25.6% | 10.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.5% | 16.6% |
| Obesity | 40.3% | 31.3% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs Beaverton
- More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 15.6% in Beaverton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 22.9% in Beaverton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 10.9% in Beaverton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Beaverton at 16.6% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
- Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 31.3% in Beaverton.
- Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Beaverton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Russell springs | Beaverton |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.7% (20) | 0.6% (619) |
| High School Diploma | 13.6% (375) | 9.8% (9,471) |
| Less than High School | 23.3% (642) | 7.2% (7,010) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 18.4% (505) | 34.9% (33,872) |
Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs Beaverton
- A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Beaverton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 9.8% in Beaverton.
- More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 7.2% in Beaverton.
- In Beaverton, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.9% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.