Demographics details for Russell springs, KY vs American fork, UT

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Russell springs, KY vs American fork, UT.

Data Russell springs American fork
Population 2,750 37,268
Median Age 44.8 years 28.0 years
Median Income $34,219 $90,490
Married Families 29.0% 42.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 4.5 4.2

Population Comparison: Russell springs vs American fork

  • The population in American fork is higher at 37,268, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
  • Residents in Russell springs have a higher median age of 44.8 years compared to 28.0 years in American fork.
  • American fork has a higher median income of $90,490, compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
  • In American fork, the percentage of married families is higher at 42.0%, compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
  • Russell springs has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in American fork.
  • The unemployment rate in Russell springs is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.2% in American fork.

Demographics

Demographics Russell springs vs American fork provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Russell springs American fork
Black 1 Data is updating
White 88 84
Asian Data is updating 1
Hispanic 3 9
Two or More Races 8 6
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Russell springs vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Russell springs at 1% compared to 0% in American fork.
  • Russell springs has a higher percentage of White residents at 88% compared to 84% in American fork.
  • In American fork, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Russell springs.
  • American fork has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 3% in Russell springs.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Russell springs at 8% compared to 6% in American fork.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Russell springs and American fork at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Russell springs American fork
Mental Health Not Good 20.7% 14.2%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 9.8%
Depression 29.0% 23.4%
Smoking 25.6% 6.7%
Binge Drinking 14.5% 8.5%
Obesity 40.3% 29.5%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 8.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Russell springs vs American fork

  • More residents in Russell springs report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 14.2% in American fork.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Russell springs at 29.0% compared to 23.4% in American fork.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Russell springs at 25.6% compared to 6.7% in American fork.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Russell springs at 14.5% compared to 8.5% in American fork.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Russell springs at 40.3% compared to 29.5% in American fork.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in American fork.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Russell springs American fork
No Schooling 0.7% (20) 0.6% (208)
High School Diploma 13.6% (375) 7.4% (2,742)
Less than High School 23.3% (642) 5.7% (2,134)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 18.4% (505) 21.3% (7,922)

Education Levels Comparison: Russell springs vs American fork

  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs have no formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in American fork.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Russell springs hold a high school diploma at 13.6% compared to 7.4% in American fork.
  • More residents in Russell springs have less than a high school education at 23.3% compared to 5.7% in American fork.
  • In American fork, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.3% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.