Demographics details for Rushville, NE vs Hoover, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rushville, NE vs Hoover, AL.
| Data | Rushville | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 799 | 92,435 |
| Median Age | 42.6 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $47,180 | $101,765 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 46.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 2.2 |
Population Comparison: Rushville vs Hoover
- The population in Hoover is higher at 92,435, compared to 799 in Rushville.
- Residents in Rushville have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 38.3 years in Hoover.
- Hoover has a higher median income of $101,765, compared to $47,180 in Rushville.
- In Hoover, the percentage of married families is higher at 46.0%, compared to 45.0% in Rushville.
- Rushville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Hoover.
- The unemployment rate in Rushville is higher at 2.5%, compared to 2.2% in Hoover.
Demographics
Demographics Rushville vs Hoover provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rushville | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 20 |
| White | 50 | 67 |
| Asian | 2 | 5 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 3 |
| American Indian | 24 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rushville vs Hoover
- In Hoover, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 20% compared to 0% in Rushville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Hoover at 67% compared to 50% in Rushville.
- In Hoover, the Asian population stands at 5%, greater than 2% in Rushville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rushville at 14% compared to 5% in Hoover.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rushville at 10% compared to 3% in Hoover.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rushville at 24% compared to 0% in Hoover.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rushville | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 14.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.6% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 21.3% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 11.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 16.7% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 32.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rushville vs Hoover
- Poor mental health levels are equal in both Rushville and Hoover at 14.9%.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Hoover at 21.3% versus 18.0% in Rushville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rushville at 19.3% compared to 11.0% in Hoover.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rushville at 21.0% compared to 16.7% in Hoover.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rushville at 44.1% compared to 32.1% in Hoover.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rushville at 31.0% compared to 9.0% in Hoover.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rushville | Hoover |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.6% (583) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (189) | 7.3% (6,787) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (138) | 3.8% (3,478) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (175) | 41.1% (38,000) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rushville vs Hoover
- In Hoover, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Rushville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rushville hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 7.3% in Hoover.
- More residents in Rushville have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 3.8% in Hoover.
- In Hoover, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.1% compared to 21.9% in Rushville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.