Demographics details for Rushville, NE vs Gibsonburg, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rushville, NE vs Gibsonburg, OH.
| Data | Rushville | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 799 | 2,436 |
| Median Age | 42.6 years | 38.7 years |
| Median Income | $47,180 | $67,279 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Rushville vs Gibsonburg
- The population in Gibsonburg is higher at 2,436, compared to 799 in Rushville.
- Residents in Rushville have a higher median age of 42.6 years compared to 38.7 years in Gibsonburg.
- Gibsonburg has a higher median income of $67,279, compared to $47,180 in Rushville.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rushville at 45.0% compared to 44.0% in Gibsonburg.
- The poverty level is identical in both Rushville and Gibsonburg at 10%.
- Gibsonburg has a higher unemployment rate at 4.3% compared to 2.5% in Rushville.
Demographics
Demographics Rushville vs Gibsonburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rushville | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 50 | 79 |
| Asian | 2 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 14 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 9 |
| American Indian | 24 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rushville vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Rushville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Gibsonburg at 79% compared to 50% in Rushville.
- The Asian population is larger in Rushville at 2% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rushville at 14% compared to 10% in Gibsonburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rushville at 10% compared to 9% in Gibsonburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rushville at 24% compared to 0% in Gibsonburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rushville | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 17.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 12.3% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 23.0% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 21.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 18.4% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 42.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rushville vs Gibsonburg
- In Gibsonburg, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.6% compared to 14.9% in Rushville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gibsonburg at 23.0% versus 18.0% in Rushville.
- Gibsonburg has a higher smoking rate at 21.9% compared to 19.3% in Rushville.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rushville at 21.0% compared to 18.4% in Gibsonburg.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rushville at 44.1% compared to 42.4% in Gibsonburg.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rushville at 31.0% compared to 11.0% in Gibsonburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rushville | Gibsonburg |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 0.2% (4) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (189) | 35.6% (867) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (138) | 5.1% (125) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (175) | 11.3% (275) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rushville vs Gibsonburg
- A higher percentage of residents in Rushville have no formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Gibsonburg.
- In Gibsonburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 35.6% compared to 23.7% in Rushville.
- More residents in Rushville have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 5.1% in Gibsonburg.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rushville hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.9% compared to 11.3% in Gibsonburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.