Demographics details for Rushville, NE vs Cave creek, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rushville, NE vs Cave creek, AZ.
| Data | Rushville | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 799 | 5,135 |
| Median Age | 42.6 years | 58.1 years |
| Median Income | $47,180 | $90,824 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 54.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Rushville vs Cave creek
- The population in Cave creek is higher at 5,135, compared to 799 in Rushville.
- The median age in Cave creek is higher at 58.1 years, compared to 42.6 years in Rushville.
- Cave creek has a higher median income of $90,824, compared to $47,180 in Rushville.
- In Cave creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 45.0% in Rushville.
- Rushville has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 8% in Cave creek.
- Cave creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.2% compared to 2.5% in Rushville.
Demographics
Demographics Rushville vs Cave creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rushville | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 50 | 88 |
| Asian | 2 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 14 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 10 | 4 |
| American Indian | 24 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rushville vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Rushville.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cave creek at 88% compared to 50% in Rushville.
- The Asian population is larger in Rushville at 2% compared to 1% in Cave creek.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rushville at 14% compared to 5% in Cave creek.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rushville at 10% compared to 4% in Cave creek.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Rushville at 24% compared to 0% in Cave creek.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rushville | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.9% | 15.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.5% | 8.5% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 19.3% | 11.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 21.0% | 19.5% |
| Obesity | 44.1% | 27.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 31.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rushville vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 15.5% compared to 14.9% in Rushville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cave creek at 20.0% versus 18.0% in Rushville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Rushville at 19.3% compared to 11.3% in Cave creek.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rushville at 21.0% compared to 19.5% in Cave creek.
- Obesity rates are higher in Rushville at 44.1% compared to 27.7% in Cave creek.
- Disability percentages are higher in Rushville at 31.0% compared to 14.0% in Cave creek.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rushville | Cave creek |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.4% (3) | 1.0% (53) |
| High School Diploma | 23.7% (189) | 11.5% (590) |
| Less than High School | 17.3% (138) | 4.2% (218) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 21.9% (175) | 40.9% (2,102) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rushville vs Cave creek
- In Cave creek, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.0% compared to 0.4% in Rushville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rushville hold a high school diploma at 23.7% compared to 11.5% in Cave creek.
- More residents in Rushville have less than a high school education at 17.3% compared to 4.2% in Cave creek.
- In Cave creek, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.9% compared to 21.9% in Rushville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.