Demographics details for Rudd, IA vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rudd, IA vs Port gibson, MS.
| Data | Rudd | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 348 | 1,206 |
| Median Age | 37.3 years | 47.3 years |
| Median Income | $70,375 | $24,773 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | Data is updating | 30% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Rudd vs Port gibson
- The population in Port gibson is higher at 1,206, compared to 348 in Rudd.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 37.3 years in Rudd.
- Rudd has a higher median income of $70,375 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rudd at 51.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 0% in Rudd.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 3.2% in Rudd.
Demographics
Demographics Rudd vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Rudd | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 82 |
| White | 98 | 12 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 6 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rudd vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 0% in Rudd.
- Rudd has a higher percentage of White residents at 98% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- The Asian population is larger in Rudd at 1% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Rudd and Port gibson at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 1% in Rudd.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rudd and Port gibson at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Rudd | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.7% | 19.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.2% | 16.0% |
| Depression | 18.0% | 20.0% |
| Smoking | 16.8% | 24.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.0% | 10.2% |
| Obesity | 37.3% | 50.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 19.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rudd vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 14.7% in Rudd.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Port gibson at 20.0% versus 18.0% in Rudd.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 16.8% in Rudd.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rudd at 23.0% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 37.3% in Rudd.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 19.0% in Rudd.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Rudd | Port gibson |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (6) |
| High School Diploma | 33.0% (115) | 9.8% (118) |
| Less than High School | 16.7% (58) | 13.3% (160) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.5% (33) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rudd vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Rudd.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rudd hold a high school diploma at 33.0% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- More residents in Rudd have less than a high school education at 16.7% compared to 13.3% in Port gibson.
- In Port gibson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 9.5% in Rudd.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.