Demographics details for Royal, AR vs Portland, OR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Royal, AR vs Portland, OR.
Data | Royal | Portland |
---|---|---|
Population | 586 | 635,067 |
Median Age | 44.0 years | 38.3 years |
Median Income | $60,000 | $85,876 |
Married Families | 60.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.0 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Royal vs Portland
- The population in Portland is higher at 635,067, compared to 586 in Royal.
- Residents in Royal have a higher median age of 44.0 years compared to 38.3 years in Portland.
- Portland has a higher median income of $85,876, compared to $60,000 in Royal.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Royal at 60.0% compared to 36.0% in Portland.
- The poverty level is higher in Portland at 13%, compared to 10% in Royal.
- The unemployment rate in Royal is higher at 5.0%, compared to 3.9% in Portland.
Demographics
Demographics Royal vs Portland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Royal | Portland |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 6 |
White | 95 | 65 |
Asian | Data is updating | 9 |
Hispanic | 2 | 10 |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 9 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Royal vs Portland
- In Portland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 6% compared to 3% in Royal.
- Royal has a higher percentage of White residents at 95% compared to 65% in Portland.
- In Portland, the Asian population stands at 9%, greater than 0% in Royal.
- Portland has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 2% in Royal.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Portland at 9%, compared to 0% in Royal.
- In Portland, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Royal.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Royal | Portland |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 17.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | Data is updating% | 9.8% |
Depression | Data is updating% | 26.3% |
Smoking | Data is updating% | 13.0% |
Binge Drinking | Data is updating% | 20.8% |
Obesity | Data is updating% | 25.6% |
Disability Percentage | Data is updating% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Royal vs Portland
- In Portland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Portland at 26.3% versus 0.0% in Royal.
- Portland has a higher smoking rate at 13.0% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Portland at 20.8% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- Portland has higher obesity rates at 25.6% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Portland at 12.0% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Royal | Portland |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 1.1% (6,977) |
High School Diploma | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 9.1% (57,861) |
Less than High School | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 8.3% (52,507) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 40.3% (256,001) |
Education Levels Comparison: Royal vs Portland
- In Portland, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- In Portland, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 9.1% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Portland at 8.3%, compared to 0.0% in Royal.
- In Portland, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 40.3% compared to 0.0% in Royal.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.