Demographics details for Rowlett, TX vs Russell springs, KY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Rowlett, TX vs Russell springs, KY.
Data | Rowlett | Russell springs |
---|---|---|
Population | 65,113 | 2,750 |
Median Age | 38.6 years | 44.8 years |
Median Income | $110,954 | $34,219 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Rowlett vs Russell springs
- In Rowlett, the population is higher at 65,113, compared to 2,750 in Russell springs.
- The median age in Russell springs is higher at 44.8 years, compared to 38.6 years in Rowlett.
- Rowlett has a higher median income of $110,954 compared to $34,219 in Russell springs.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Rowlett at 47.0% compared to 29.0% in Russell springs.
- The poverty level is higher in Russell springs at 15%, compared to 6% in Rowlett.
- Russell springs has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 4.1% in Rowlett.
Demographics
Demographics Rowlett vs Russell springs provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Rowlett | Russell springs |
---|---|---|
Black | 21 | 1 |
White | 42 | 88 |
Asian | 7 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 21 | 3 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 8 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Rowlett vs Russell springs
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Rowlett at 21% compared to 1% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Russell springs at 88% compared to 42% in Rowlett.
- The Asian population is larger in Rowlett at 7% compared to 0% in Russell springs.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Rowlett at 21% compared to 3% in Russell springs.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Rowlett at 9% compared to 8% in Russell springs.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Rowlett and Russell springs at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Rowlett | Russell springs |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 15.0% | 20.7% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.1% | 15.6% |
Depression | 21.8% | 29.0% |
Smoking | 12.8% | 25.6% |
Binge Drinking | 20.0% | 14.5% |
Obesity | 30.4% | 40.3% |
Disability Percentage | 8.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Rowlett vs Russell springs
- In Russell springs, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 15.0% in Rowlett.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Russell springs at 29.0% versus 21.8% in Rowlett.
- Russell springs has a higher smoking rate at 25.6% compared to 12.8% in Rowlett.
- Binge drinking is more common in Rowlett at 20.0% compared to 14.5% in Russell springs.
- Russell springs has higher obesity rates at 40.3% compared to 30.4% in Rowlett.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Russell springs at 15.0% compared to 8.0% in Rowlett.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Rowlett | Russell springs |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.5% (331) | 0.7% (20) |
High School Diploma | 12.7% (8,282) | 13.6% (375) |
Less than High School | 7.7% (5,011) | 23.3% (642) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 25.3% (16,484) | 18.4% (505) |
Education Levels Comparison: Rowlett vs Russell springs
- In Russell springs, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.5% in Rowlett.
- In Russell springs, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 13.6% compared to 12.7% in Rowlett.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Russell springs at 23.3%, compared to 7.7% in Rowlett.
- A higher percentage of residents in Rowlett hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.3% compared to 18.4% in Russell springs.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.